A swirl of rumours and speculation has engulfed the high-profile engagement of cricketer Smriti Mandhana and musician Palash Muchhal, but nothing has been confirmed. The wedding, scheduled for November 23, 2025, was postponed when Smriti’s father suffered a health scare, forcing both families to put celebrations on hold. In the aftermath, Smriti removed all pre-wedding photos from her social media accounts and deleted content related to the ceremonies, deepening public curiosity.
On top of that, the internet erupted after screenshots surfaced on social media showing allegedly flirty direct messages between Palash Muchhal and an unknown woman. The woman, identified only by a pseudonym, sparked controversy by claiming the chats were real. In one message, Palash reportedly admitted the relationship with Smriti was on shaky ground, calling it “dead most of the time.”
Chats from some Palash allegedly flirted with,
While being in relationship with Smriti.. pic.twitter.com/vWrE9VSf90— Albert (@Albertbhaiii) November 24, 2025
This development has provoked strong reactions. Many fans are calling for transparency, demanding the couple address the alleged betrayal if it’s true. Some of the comments directed at Palash have been harsh, with critics asking whether Smriti was made to delete memories and whether she deserved better. Others have urged empathy for the families, calling for a pause until verified facts emerge. Social media remains a mix of outrage, concern, speculation, and support.
On the other hand, a few observers have warned against jumping to conclusions. They argue that nothing is confirmed yet, that leaked chats could be tampered with, and the timing of Smriti’s father’s illness could have forced the couple into damage control. Many have cautioned against consuming rumours as facts, calling it unfair to both individuals involved.
So far, neither Smriti Mandhana nor Palash Muchhal has issued any public statement confirming or denying the leak. Palash’s sister, singer Palak Muchhal, had earlier requested privacy when the wedding was first postponed, asking well-wishers to refrain from speculation. That request now feels almost obsolete given the intensity of the public reaction.
At the heart of the turmoil is a young couple whose joyous milestone has suddenly turned into a media spectacle. The focus has shifted from celebration to scrutiny, from love to suspicion, all within days. Until verified facts emerge, the public remains in limbo, questioning, debating, and awaiting clarity.

