As the courtroom drama-film Haq, starring Yami Gautam and Emraan Hashmi, gears up for a 7 November theatrical release, it has hit a major legal roadblock. The legal heirs of the late Shah Bano Begum have filed a petition in the Indore High Court seeking to restrain the film’s release. The family alleges the movie draws directly from Begum’s life and legal case without consent and portrays themes that offend the Muslim community.
The Allegations Against Yami Gautam, Emraan Hashmi’s Film
The petition, filed through advocate Tousif Warsi, argues that the filmmakers have depicted Shah Bano Begum’s personal story—purportedly involving her landmark Supreme Court appeal following her divorce—without legal authorisation from her heirs. They claim the storyline is likely to defame her image and misrepresent Sharia law and Muslim women’s rights.
Also read: Paresh Rawal Blasts National Awards As ‘Lobby-Driven Game’; Says Even Oscars Aren’t Immune
The family contends they were not provided with a full script or narrative overview, even though the film is nearly ready for release. In their view, the makers should have disclosed details and obtained permission, especially since the story is reportedly “inspired” by the 1985 case of Begum. The petition asks the court to intervene before a single frame reaches cinemas.
On the other side, the filmmakers maintain that Haq is a work of fiction inspired by but not directly portraying Shah Bano’s life. Director Suparn Varma reportedly clarified that the narrative is not a biopic, and changes—including character names—have been deliberately introduced to avoid liability. According to reports, the production team is already represented by Hitesh Jain (Parinaam Law) and Ameet Naik (Naik & Naik).
To provide context: Shah Bano Begum became a focal figure in India’s legal history in her maintenance petition case, Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum-And Ors. in 1985, when the Supreme Court ruled in her favour—sparking national debate about religion, gender and law.
The legal action underscores two significant issues: first, the rights of real-life individuals (or their survivors) when cinematic content claims inspiration; second, how films tackling sensitive matters like religion or civil rights may face legal and social push-back before release. When the heirs of a historic figure allege both defamation and lack of consent, the risk of injunctions and financial implications for a film increases.
In the case of Haq—which presents itself as a courtroom drama examining marriage, divorce and community law—the complaint hits at the heart of its marketing: a “based on true events” banner can invite not just interest, but legal scrutiny. If the film is perceived to mirror Begum’s life too closely, it risks being pulled or delayed, and the interim publicity may tilt negatively.
The Indore High Court has reportedly scheduled the matter for hearing soon. While the film’s team continues promotional activity, the cloud of potential litigation could affect its release strategy. Some analysts suggest the makers may engage in last-minute revisions or voluntary disclaimers to placate the petitioners. Others say a stay is unlikely unless the petitioners produce strong prima facie evidence of defamation or rights violation.
Indian cinema has seen similar controversies where real-life figures or their families objected to fictionalised portrayals. Legal experts note such conflicts often rest on whether character names, identifiable events and likenesses are sufficiently altered. The balance between creative freedom and personal rights remains murky.
For the audience, the controversy can create two outcomes: heightened curiosity (often dubbed “the Streisand effect”) or moral caution that leads to walk-outs or boycotts. Box-office analysts suggest Haq could benefit from a surge of interest pre-release—but also risk a decrement if the legal shadow translates to negative press or enforced edits.
At this junction, Haq stands at a precarious intersection of art, law and memory. The heirs’ legal challenge places the film under early judicial spotlight, and its ultimate release may hinge not just on star power or director reputation, but also on how carefully filmmakers handle the ‘inspired by true events’ label. For Yami Gautam, Emraan Hashmi and the production team, the path forward means navigating the courtroom as adeptly as they hoped to portray it on screen.